Enfield's School Audit: A Breakdown in Communication and Oversight

Image
The newly released audit of the Board of Education's $5.6 million cost overrun makes one thing clear: this wasn't a simple mistake. It was a systemic failure — the result of siloed operations, weak internal rigor, and missteps by both the school district and the town. And here's the hard truth: Enfield still hasn't actually paid for this failure. Town reserves covered the gap, shrinking our financial cushion and limiting our ability to soften future tax hikes. Next year's budget will reveal just how vulnerable we are. What this incident tells us is that Enfield isn't managing its risk very well — and that should worry everyone. Fundamentally, this was a costly risk-management failure, and nothing in the audit suggests it can't happen again.  [ Audit link , and Council  slide deck ] CliftonLarsonAllen (CLA), the audit firm, outlines eight major problems, many of them rooted in communication breakdowns between the town, the school district, and the state. The ...
Post a Comment

Enfield to Pay Over $1 Million in Legal Fees After Violating Disability Rights


AI generated art 



Enfield is on the hook for more than $1 million in legal fees after a federal court ruled that the town and its Board of Education violated federal disability laws by failing to accommodate Sarah Hernandez, an autistic and deaf elected official.

In 2017, Ms. Hernandez was a newly elected school board member. Instead of providing reasonable accommodations for her to participate in board meetings fully, the town chose to fight a multi-year federal legal battle.

After about five years, a U.S. District Court jury ruled in January 2024 that Enfield discriminated against Ms. Hernandez in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). She won little in damages from the court, but the court later issued a permanent injunction requiring the town not to discriminate against people with disabilities. The town had to pay her legal cost, and that bill has arrived.

On March 7, the U.S. District Court in Bridgeport ordered Enfield to pay $964,366 in attorneys' fees and $60,579 in litigation costs, bringing the total judgment to just over $1 million. 

The Town Council is set to discuss the court's decision at its meeting on Monday. It will likely do so in executive session.

Barring any avenues of appeal, Enfield appears to be liable for the full amount.

A jury ruled in the case last year, finding that Enfield "Excluded Ms. Hernandez from equal participation," among other findings. It only won $10 in damages from the jury, but Enfield was still responsible for legal plaintiffs legal costs.  

Ms. Hernandez attorneys originally sought $1.3 million. 

The Cost to Enfield is Higher

The $1.024 million Enfield must pay only covers Hernandez's legal fees and litigation expenses. It does not include what Enfield spent on its legal defense. The total cost to taxpayers could be significantly higher. The council should disclose the total cost of this case.

A Case of Systemic Discrimination

Hernandez required basic accommodations, such as written communications and having speakers face her so she could read lips. She wanted access to written documents in executive sessions.

Enfield's Settlement Offer

In 2023, Enfield made a pre-trial offered Hernandez $75,000 to settle the case, but it was rejected, in part, because the offer didn't include any commitment to change its behavior, something U.S. District Court Judge Stefan Underhill, noted in his decision. In his ruling, Judge Stefan: "Although the total dollar amount of fees may be high compared to the amount of monetary damages awarded by the jury, it reasonably reflects the five years of effort required to litigate this case, considering the significant opposition that Hernandez faced at each stage of the litigation." 



Comments

New comments are not allowed.