Enfield considers charter changes that could reshape its political landscape

Image
Charter Revision Commission meeting last week Enfield’s Charter Revision Commission met Thursday for its first in-depth workshop, generating a long list of proposals that could significantly alter how the town governs itself. Ideas ranged from switching to a two-year budget cycle, allowing a budget referendum, and compensating elected officials, or even shifting to a mayoral form of government. Other proposals included banning profanity on signs, locking non-governmental flag restrictions into the Charter, and changes such ending council districts. The meeting was structured as a pitch session, with each commission member suggesting topics for future discussion. In-depth discussions are to take place at subsequent meetings. While many proposals are unlikely to move forward—either because of insufficient support or legal concerns raised by the Town Attorney—the meeting highlighted potential flashpoints for what promises to be a spirited Charter revision process. Mayor Nelson’s Proposals...
Post a Comment

Fix it or face foreclosure: Enfield’s blight ordinance targets minor issues

 

Chipped paint on Town Hall is blight under the town's proposed blight ordinance

Imagine being fined $100 a day because your lawn grew too tall while you were in the hospital. Under Enfield's proposed blight ordinance, this nightmare could become a reality for many residents. The Town Council will consider this revised ordinance at its Monday night meeting—but as written, it could harm hundreds of residents over minor cosmetic issues, from overgrown grass to temporary home repairs.


While it's reasonable to address properties that pose genuine health and safety risks, this ordinance goes too far by treating cosmetic issues as equally severe.


For example, if grass or weeds grow taller than 12 inches, the town can issue a citation requiring correction within 10 days. If it's not addressed in time, the property maintenance inspector can impose fines of $100 a day—with no cap—until the problem is resolved. In extreme cases, these escalating fines could even lead to foreclosure.


The process for notifying property owners is equally flawed. The town relies on hand-delivered notices or certified mail. If the owner can’t be reached, the town publishes a notice in a local newspaper. But what if someone is hospitalized or away in an emergency? Who will see a legal notice? A simple phone call, text, or email could prevent unnecessary misunderstandings, yet the ordinance includes no such human element.


Minor problems, big fines

The problems don’t end there. Temporary and routine issues—like a broken section of fence, a tarp on a small part of a roof, or even parking a car on the grass—could now be classified as blight. These situations often arise because repairs are expensive, and residents address them as soon as they can. Yet under this ordinance, even these minor issues could result in aggressive enforcement and steep fines.


For elderly, disabled, or low-income residents, the stakes are even higher. This ordinance provides no meaningful protections or support for people in difficult circumstances. Is cruelty the goal?


Other towns have rejected ordinances like this for good reason. East Windsor residents, for example, voted down a similar policy last year, fearing it would give the town excessive control over private property. As one resident told CT Insider, "What I do or have that does not adversely affect you is none of your business."


No one wants to live next to a truly blighted property—but what is blight? The term is subjective, and Enfield's ordinance fails to distinguish between minor cosmetic issues and serious health or safety concerns. 


A better approach

By comparison, Tolland's ordinance offers a more reasonable approach. In sharp contrast to Enfield, It only considers cosmetic issues as blight if there are three or more cosmetic conditions. It also incorporates safeguards for vulnerable populations. Their process requires a meeting with Human Services to provide assistance and ensure fair treatment.


Enfield's ordinance lacks these safeguards. It is overly punitive, and not ready for adoption. Residents could face substantial fines for minor, temporary issues—and that's simply unfair.


Enfield officials must revise this ordinance to include protections for elderly, disabled, and low-income residents, as well as clear definitions separating cosmetic and health concerns. Residents should demand a more balanced and compassionate approach. Monday’s meeting may be your last chance to protect yourself from the town. 

Location: Enfield, CT 06082, USA

Comments

  1. AnonymousDecember 15, 2024 at 5:51 PM

    Well said. I expect those of us espousing the national movement to protect pollinators using "Low Mow May" or "No Mow Spring" signs will be targeted (goodbye, bees)...in general this ordinance looks to be a crass simplistic and unfair way to supposedly remedy the Town's pitiful budget crunch.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousDecember 16, 2024 at 12:01 AM

    I often see neighbors struggling with their maintenance and they can’t afford to hire someone else for the job as good neighbors we try to help each other by shoveling a little extra area this type law will pit neighbors against each other

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why is Enfield in trouble? Facts with a dose of sarcasm

Image
Molly at School Rally People are going after spending in Enfield and trying to dissect it to see where they can find gross mismanagement. Since the Republicans have been in control for all but two of the last 16 years, let's assume that the town's spending is pristine and error-free and beyond reproach—except for the two years when the Democrats were in charge. As we all know, the Democrats dumped money out of the windows of Town Hall. The Town Council Republicans are going to try to set a token reduction in the Mill Rate. To reach that point, they may have to do some problematic things, such as deferring spending on things like police cruiser replacements and equipment generally, putting off some maintenance, and not filling vacancies and laying off where they can, and who knows what else. There's a lot they can't touch, namely contractual salary obligations. But they want to be able to say that they reduced taxes. More concerning will be how much of the costs are bein...
Read more

Fewer kids, fewer costumes: What declining school enrollment means for trick-or-treating

Image
Enfield has experienced a significant and ongoing decline in public school enrollment over an 18 year period. When compared to four nearby towns of similar population size, Enfield and Middletown show the steepest declines. Many factors may be contributing to this trend. These include smaller family sizes, lower fertility rates, job market, cost of living including housing costs, an aging population across the state, and an increase in families choosing alternative education options, such as homeschooling. The data is available at EdSight . The enrollment data only covers the last 18 years. Update : After reading some of the insightful Facebook comments , more data is needed to show how population changes are contributing to the school population decline. The comments about an increase in homeschooling were thought-provoking. I wish there was a way to quantify that shift; I suspect the school district may have some estimates. Enfield has experienced an approximate 8.76% decline in ...
Read more