The Public Deserves to See the Trash Outsourcing Report

Image
Art generated by AI following author's prompt: Report locked in safe The Enfield Town Council is considering a consequential issue: outsourcing our public works trash removal service. However, the town has not released the consultant's report, which likely examines the pros and cons of such a move, even as the Council begins its budget deliberations. The town council authorized the hiring of the consultants in November, 2024. On April 7, 2025, the Town Council discussed the report in executive session. I submitted a Freedom of Information Act request for a report copy this week. The Town Manager's office responded that the report is still in draft format and is not eligible for public disclosure under the Connecticut Freedom of Information Act. I was also told: "The contract has not provided us a completion date at this time." That means the report could be withheld from the public indefinitely. Draft is not an automatic exemption This was my response: "My un...

PZC approves 70-unit housing development in Thompsonville

 

Screen shot from PZC meeting. Site plan of Impact Residential project.


Despite parking concerns, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved a 70-unit housing development on the former Strand Theater site. The Commission voted 5-2 Thursday.


The action allows Impact Residential to proceed with its project, which includes 56 units of affordable housing.


The project met opposition due to fears of increased on-street parking, with opponents including Mayor Ken Nelson. At its Dec. 4 meeting, the Council rejected a grant application that would have assisted developer Impact Residential.


Nelson suggested allocating the grant to a "parking structure" instead.


"We have to address the parking, which is already a problem, and we just can't make it worse," Nelson said at the earlier meeting.


But at Thursday's meeting, PZC Chair Lewis Fiore, highlighting the area's designation as a Transit Oriented District (TOD), argued that rejecting the project would undermine this status.


In general, TOD districts reduce parking requirements, de-emphasizing parking in favor of transit.


"If we're going to keep using parking as an excuse to not go forward, we're never going to go forward with anything in this town," Fiore said.


"You build the housing first, and then the economic development occurs," Fiore added.


PZC member Linda DeGray, who also supported the project, said, "I understand the parking issues, but I also understand that we have to move forward. We have to look to the future."


DeGray noted that many people she knows no longer have cars.

"They use Ubers, Lyfts, buses, and other forms of transportation; they have e-bikes and scooters," she said. "I think this is really a fit for the future."

Patrick Tallarita, owner of the old Thompsonville firehouse at 11 Pearl, spoke in favor of the project. According to zoning records, he plans to create a beer and wine tap room.


Tallarita said parking will always be a problem in Thompsonville, "but sometimes progress needs to come before the solutions."


"There's opportunity in Thompsonville to improve the parking, but we need development to spur that on," Tallarita told the commissioners.


Commission member Virginia Higley, voting against it, cited Thompsonville's parking issues and the site's need for mixed-use, specifically retail, development.


Initially, the developers proposed a larger complex with some retail. But after council pushback regarding parking, they scaled back their development. Following further study on Thompsonville's retail situation, the developers opted against including retail in the smaller project, citing a 50% vacancy rate in retail in the immediate area, which would have made such development risky.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fix it or face foreclosure: Enfield’s blight ordinance targets minor issues

Image
  Chipped paint on Town Hall is blight under the town's proposed blight ordinance Imagine being fined $100 a day because your lawn grew too tall while you were in the hospital. Under Enfield's proposed blight ordinance, this nightmare could become a reality for many residents. The Town Council will consider this revised ordinance at its Monday night meeting—but as written, it could harm hundreds of residents over minor cosmetic issues, from overgrown grass to temporary home repairs. While it's reasonable to address properties that pose genuine health and safety risks, this ordinance goes too far by treating cosmetic issues as equally severe. For example, if grass or weeds grow taller than 12 inches, the town can issue a citation requiring correction within 10 days. If it's not addressed in time, the property maintenance inspector can impose fines of $100 a day—with no cap—until the problem is resolved. In extreme cases, these escalating fines could even lead to foreclos...
Read more

Why is Enfield in trouble? Facts with a dose of sarcasm

Image
Molly at School Rally People are going after spending in Enfield and trying to dissect it to see where they can find gross mismanagement. Since the Republicans have been in control for all but two of the last 16 years, let's assume that the town's spending is pristine and error-free and beyond reproach—except for the two years when the Democrats were in charge. As we all know, the Democrats dumped money out of the windows of Town Hall. The Town Council Republicans are going to try to set a token reduction in the Mill Rate. To reach that point, they may have to do some problematic things, such as deferring spending on things like police cruiser replacements and equipment generally, putting off some maintenance, and not filling vacancies and laying off where they can, and who knows what else. There's a lot they can't touch, namely contractual salary obligations. But they want to be able to say that they reduced taxes. More concerning will be how much of the costs are bein...
Read more

Enfield to Pay Over $1 Million in Legal Fees After Violating Disability Rights

Image
AI generated art  Enfield is on the hook for more than $1 million in legal fees after a federal court ruled that the town and its Board of Education violated federal disability laws by failing to accommodate Sarah Hernandez, an autistic and deaf elected official. In 2017, Ms. Hernandez was a newly elected school board member. Instead of providing reasonable accommodations for her to participate in board meetings fully, the town chose to fight a multi-year federal legal battle. After about five years, a U.S. District Court jury ruled in January 2024 that Enfield discriminated against Ms. Hernandez in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). She won little in damages from the court, but the court later issued a permanent injunction requiring the town not to discriminate against people with disabilities. The town had to pay her legal cost, and that bill has arrived. On March 7, the U.S. District Court in Bridgeport ordered Enfield to pay $964,366 in attorneys' fees and ...
Read more