Is Enfield considering privatizing trash removal? Let's discuss.

Image
  Recent discussions in the Enfield CT Open Forum have sparked concerns about a potential plan to privatize the town's trash removal services. This originated from a union post suggesting this idea might be under consideration. While details remain incomplete, the implications could be significant for our community, and we need clarity before any decisions are made. Current service excellence Enfield’s municipal trash pickup has long been a model of reliability and quality. Our town’s workers know the community, understand our unique needs, and deliver consistent, dependable service week after week. These relationships and local knowledge are assets that cannot be easily replaced. Questions that need answers Financial impact and analysis Has the town conducted a thorough cost-benefit analysis of privatization? Are there multi-year projections to show the expected return on investment? How would privatization affect long-term cost stability for residents? What will happen to the to

PZC approves 70-unit housing development in Thompsonville

 

Screen shot from PZC meeting. Site plan of Impact Residential project.


Despite parking concerns, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved a 70-unit housing development on the former Strand Theater site. The Commission voted 5-2 Thursday.


The action allows Impact Residential to proceed with its project, which includes 56 units of affordable housing.


The project met opposition due to fears of increased on-street parking, with opponents including Mayor Ken Nelson. At its Dec. 4 meeting, the Council rejected a grant application that would have assisted developer Impact Residential.


Nelson suggested allocating the grant to a "parking structure" instead.


"We have to address the parking, which is already a problem, and we just can't make it worse," Nelson said at the earlier meeting.


But at Thursday's meeting, PZC Chair Lewis Fiore, highlighting the area's designation as a Transit Oriented District (TOD), argued that rejecting the project would undermine this status.


In general, TOD districts reduce parking requirements, de-emphasizing parking in favor of transit.


"If we're going to keep using parking as an excuse to not go forward, we're never going to go forward with anything in this town," Fiore said.


"You build the housing first, and then the economic development occurs," Fiore added.


PZC member Linda DeGray, who also supported the project, said, "I understand the parking issues, but I also understand that we have to move forward. We have to look to the future."


DeGray noted that many people she knows no longer have cars.

"They use Ubers, Lyfts, buses, and other forms of transportation; they have e-bikes and scooters," she said. "I think this is really a fit for the future."

Patrick Tallarita, owner of the old Thompsonville firehouse at 11 Pearl, spoke in favor of the project. According to zoning records, he plans to create a beer and wine tap room.


Tallarita said parking will always be a problem in Thompsonville, "but sometimes progress needs to come before the solutions."


"There's opportunity in Thompsonville to improve the parking, but we need development to spur that on," Tallarita told the commissioners.


Commission member Virginia Higley, voting against it, cited Thompsonville's parking issues and the site's need for mixed-use, specifically retail, development.


Initially, the developers proposed a larger complex with some retail. But after council pushback regarding parking, they scaled back their development. Following further study on Thompsonville's retail situation, the developers opted against including retail in the smaller project, citing a 50% vacancy rate in retail in the immediate area, which would have made such development risky.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Enfield is in trouble? Facts with a dose of sarcasm

Fewer kids, fewer costumes: What declining school enrollment means for trick-or-treating

Enfield Town Council's unprofessional action