Charter Commission proposes 7% budget cap, a fix that won't solve the problem

Image
Charter Revision Commission. Budget limit debate on YouTube video starts at about 1:24:00 The Charter Revision Commission (CRC) approved a budget referendum, but only if officials proposed a budget that exceeded a 7% increase. If the budget fails in the referendum, it would automatically cap at 7%. By forcing a referendum on any budget exceeding 7%, the CRC proposal effectively imposes a budget cap. While this might sound like a way to control taxes, it overlooks a fundamental issue: property tax rates fluctuate due to factors outside the town’s control. The 2023 budget year proves this point: even with a 5.4% budget increase, homeowners saw their tax bills jump by 8-9%. The increase in taxes wasn't entirely due to spending—it happened because property taxes are affected by multiple conditions. A budget cap wouldn't have prevented these increases. Enfield's problem is revenue. Property taxes must make up the difference when other revenue sources decline—whether state aid, ...
Post a Comment

My testimony about the East Windsor casino and gambling in Connecticut


The General Assembly is holding a hearing Feb. 26 on several bills to expand gambling in Connecticut. I've written in opposition to this plan:

Dear lawmakers,

I live in Enfield near the planned East Windsor casino and dread its arrival. And that’s why I’m writing. I wish to express concern about legislation that will expand gambling in Connecticut

I am submitting this testimony in opposition to H.B. 7055: An Act Creating the Connecticut Gambling Commission and Creating a Competitive Bidding Process for a Resort Casino and I am also opposed to S.B. 11 An Act Concerning the Authorization of a Casino Gaming Facility in East Windsor. I am also opposed to S.B.17 An Act Authorizing Sports Wagering, Internet Gambling and Internet Keno. I’m also opposed to S.B. 665 An Act Concerning Sports Wagering.

A little background: There was no demand in Northern Connecticut for a casino. None. Many residents oppose it and there is a feeling that it was forced upon us.

You may think, what’s the harm with building a casino in East Windsor? Especially since there is a casino is Springfield, about 10 miles away.

The East Windsor casino is completely unlike the Springfield facility.

The planned East Windsor casino is a shopping center style facility just down the road from a Walmart. Our senior citizens -- and other vulnerable populations -- are going to feel a lot more comfortable going there than to Springfield. The dynamic is completely different.

A lot of us don’t want this casino near our homes, near our families. The East Windsor casino site is near the Enfield town line.

There is a certain percentage of the population that is vulnerable to problem gambling. But a lot of those people will never really discover their problem until they have easy access to a casino. There’s no shortage of studies that support a finding that as much as 50% of gambling revenue comes from problem gamblers.

We worry that we will hear about friends, family and neighbors that become problem gamblers.

There is concern about increased DUI drivers on our local roads, something that has been true for Connecticut’s other casinos. There are concerns about crime.

And now we're going to do sports betting?

Why didn't the state fund a study to examine the economic and social impacts of expanded gambling on our region?

How the East Windsor casino was approved without examining its traffic impact on Enfield and Windsor Locks?

Connecticut has been ruined by lawmakers who didn’t look out for people. They shortchanged pensions and ran up the debt and are now using gambling to help get out of the mess they created. It just piles one moral harm upon another.

I am a proud member of the Coalition Against Casino Expansion in CT (CACE). A great group of people who stand for something. It’s a faith-based group that is doing its best to look out for our families. If there’s anything decent left in this state, you will do the same.

Sincerely,

Patrick Thibodeau

Enfield CT 06082

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fix it or face foreclosure: Enfield’s blight ordinance targets minor issues

Image
  Chipped paint on Town Hall is blight under the town's proposed blight ordinance Imagine being fined $100 a day because your lawn grew too tall while you were in the hospital. Under Enfield's proposed blight ordinance, this nightmare could become a reality for many residents. The Town Council will consider this revised ordinance at its Monday night meeting—but as written, it could harm hundreds of residents over minor cosmetic issues, from overgrown grass to temporary home repairs. While it's reasonable to address properties that pose genuine health and safety risks, this ordinance goes too far by treating cosmetic issues as equally severe. For example, if grass or weeds grow taller than 12 inches, the town can issue a citation requiring correction within 10 days. If it's not addressed in time, the property maintenance inspector can impose fines of $100 a day—with no cap—until the problem is resolved. In extreme cases, these escalating fines could even lead to foreclos...
Read more

Why is Enfield in trouble? Facts with a dose of sarcasm

Image
Molly at School Rally People are going after spending in Enfield and trying to dissect it to see where they can find gross mismanagement. Since the Republicans have been in control for all but two of the last 16 years, let's assume that the town's spending is pristine and error-free and beyond reproach—except for the two years when the Democrats were in charge. As we all know, the Democrats dumped money out of the windows of Town Hall. The Town Council Republicans are going to try to set a token reduction in the Mill Rate. To reach that point, they may have to do some problematic things, such as deferring spending on things like police cruiser replacements and equipment generally, putting off some maintenance, and not filling vacancies and laying off where they can, and who knows what else. There's a lot they can't touch, namely contractual salary obligations. But they want to be able to say that they reduced taxes. More concerning will be how much of the costs are bein...
Read more

Fewer kids, fewer costumes: What declining school enrollment means for trick-or-treating

Image
Enfield has experienced a significant and ongoing decline in public school enrollment over an 18 year period. When compared to four nearby towns of similar population size, Enfield and Middletown show the steepest declines. Many factors may be contributing to this trend. These include smaller family sizes, lower fertility rates, job market, cost of living including housing costs, an aging population across the state, and an increase in families choosing alternative education options, such as homeschooling. The data is available at EdSight . The enrollment data only covers the last 18 years. Update : After reading some of the insightful Facebook comments , more data is needed to show how population changes are contributing to the school population decline. The comments about an increase in homeschooling were thought-provoking. I wish there was a way to quantify that shift; I suspect the school district may have some estimates. Enfield has experienced an approximate 8.76% decline in ...
Read more