News Analysis: What Happens When ICE Comes to Enfield?

Image
  Freshwater Pond, Enfield CT Concern is high, generally, about what happens when ICE makes a concerted push in our community. Would we see something similar to Minnesota? That operation involved a saturation surge -- of more than 2,000 agents into the Twin Cities -- that overwhelmed local police capability. The question becomes do all communities face a similar risk, especially from agents that don't seem well-trained in de-escalation techniques. Enfield is too small of a town to get a massive ICE response. But it is the practice of ICE to operate independently from local police departments, which creates its own set of risks. Connecticut has a law, the Connecticut Trust Act, that sets some restrictions on what local police can do to help federal immigration enforcement. The Trust Act explicitly forbids local police from assisting federal agents unless specific serious criteria are met. But does the Trust Act protect residents, or does it just keep local police from helping in ce...
Post a Comment

Reactions to climate change on Enfield's Facebook forum


Enfield

Enfield is probably typical to many other suburban towns. It has a large number of people who see climate change as a liberal conspiracy and plot to take "control" of the economy. You can see a little of this on the Enfield community forum on Facebook. The responses to my recent post on Enfield's climate risks illustrates this to a degree. 

 It's very easy to turn a Facebook post into a name-calling festival. The admins of the community open forum do a very good job trying to moderate this risk. But the reactions to the climate change problem can be discouraging. The discussion mirrors the broader, national response. There's a paralysis on the issue and outright hostility to the science lead by President Trump. 

 This was my response on Facebook: 

The amount of C02 in our thin atmosphere is increasing at a rate that the planet hasn't seen before. We know this and we know the cause. There's nothing natural about the increase or its cause. We're doing it. Scientists have known for 100++ years that C02 acts as a heat trapping gas. You can lie to yourself about many things, but not about atmospheric chemistry. The global temperature may increase by 7 degrees Fahrenheit by 2100 and that is well within the range of outcomes. 

 The oceans have been capturing much of the CO2 so far, but it's increasing the pH levels, the acidity of the oceans. This will impact the food chain. They can measure this. 

 The people who see this as no big deal, or some kind of natural event, and oppose measures to reverse direction are making a bet. They are betting that they are right. They are saying to their children that they have nothing to worry about. The evidence says that people who hold this view are not only very wrong but are reckless. 

 There's a school of thought that says humanity won't get its act together. There's a belief that the U.S., still the most powerful and scientifically advanced nation on the planet, won't muster the resolve to lead the world out of this mess. There are a lot of people who believe we're incapable -- man and womankind -- of taking the steps to do the right thing. There are some young people, and I am not kidding you, who are debating whether they should have children. They don't want to bring them into a dying world. I personally believe they are wrong. There is still hope and time. But it is time for us to look out for one another and the future. The whining and name calling and political blaming has to end.

Comments

Post a Comment