Is Enfield considering privatizing trash removal? Let's discuss.

Image
  Recent discussions in the Enfield CT Open Forum have sparked concerns about a potential plan to privatize the town's trash removal services. This originated from a union post suggesting this idea might be under consideration. While details remain incomplete, the implications could be significant for our community, and we need clarity before any decisions are made. Current service excellence Enfield’s municipal trash pickup has long been a model of reliability and quality. Our town’s workers know the community, understand our unique needs, and deliver consistent, dependable service week after week. These relationships and local knowledge are assets that cannot be easily replaced. Questions that need answers Financial impact and analysis Has the town conducted a thorough cost-benefit analysis of privatization? Are there multi-year projections to show the expected return on investment? How would privatization affect long-term cost stability for residents? What will happen to the to
Post a Comment

If the Enfield JFK renovation is defeated, what happens?

Storm is coming. Thompsonville. Taken Nov. 3, 2018

It feels as if sentiment in Enfield is building in support of the $84 million Enfield Middle School renovation. This isn't anchored to anything solid. But the supporters on the Enfield CT Open Forum, if they don't outnumber the opponents are at least holding their own, and a few of the reliably conservative voices have expressed support.

The photos posted on Facebook are difficult to argue against. The use of a portable heating system, delivered out of a truck, is indisputable evidence that the town is going to have to spend a lot of money on this school.

The town voters are being asked, in the Tuesday referendum, to approve about $27 million in town funds for a $84 million reconstruction of the school. The state is paying 70 percent.

If the referendum fails, what happens?

State support evaporates: Enfield has a state commitment for 70 percent reimbursement of the renovation cost. Should voters reject the JFK renovation a second time (they rejected it in 2017), the town will likely lose this funding commitment. The town can apply again for state help but Enfield is now at the end of the line among other towns. Moreover, the state is reducing the amount it sets aside for school renovation funding. This reimbursement means for a $27 million town investment, Enfield gets an $84 million renovation. 

The school still needs to be fixed: This includes heating, air conditioning, and removing hazardous materials, including PCPs. It also requires an upgrade to meet federal disability requirements. A 2015 study put this cost at $15 million. I've never seen the details of this estimate, but it has been described to me as something so bare-bones it won't pay for a new coat of paint. 

The town will have to bond again: It can't do this work piecemeal. It has to done coherently and it will be more expensive to try to do it in little pieces. The town will have to come back with a new plan and it's going to be a lot more than $15 million. This is a 50-year-school that handles 1,200 students. It needs an upgrade.  The taxpayers may end up paying more than $27 million as a result of reduced state support. 

Home prices may be hurt: There is a direct relationship between the quality of schools and home values. Young families will reject Enfield if the town's schools are sub-par and JFK -- in its present condition -- is a complete dump. If this renovation is rejected a second time, Enfield's reputation will take a solid hit. 

Fermi is not an option: The middle school's hub and spoke design separates 6th grade students from the older students. Fermi has to be adapted as a middle school. The building -- which is nearly as old as JFK -- also needs an upgrade. It may not get state money. Fermi is no longer a school and under the state school renovation rules may not be eligible for state support. People will say 'that makes no sense.' I agree. But that's how it works. 

What about the future of Enfield? 

People in Enfield -- and just about every other Connecticut town and city -- have always complained about taxes. I've never heard anything different since graduating from EHS in 1972. But this town, in the end, has a reputation of doing what's right for the future. 

Enfield's future is bright. Its advantages are strong. Young families are moving into Enfield. I see them and their children on my street and lifts my heart. It really does. But the town is at a crossroads. 

If Enfield rejects this referendum, it will miss an opportunity to deliver a school that will serve this town well for another half century. It may give people pause about the community. It will discourage some about its future. A vote 'no' won't do a thing to help those who complain about taxes. If Enfield is seen as less desirable, the town's reputation as a good place to live will suffer.  And we will all pay for that. 

[A note: I'm not writing this out of thin air. I've worked as a newspaper reporter in Connecticut and a tech policy reporter in Washington for combined nearly 40 years. I've covered towns and cities, and have covered Congress. Certain things remain the same, and some opportunities are fleeting. This is one of them)



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Enfield is in trouble? Facts with a dose of sarcasm

Image
Molly at School Rally People are going after spending in Enfield and trying to dissect it to see where they can find gross mismanagement. Since the Republicans have been in control for all but two of the last 16 years, let's assume that the town's spending is pristine and error-free and beyond reproach—except for the two years when the Democrats were in charge. As we all know, the Democrats dumped money out of the windows of Town Hall. The Town Council Republicans are going to try to set a token reduction in the Mill Rate. To reach that point, they may have to do some problematic things, such as deferring spending on things like police cruiser replacements and equipment generally, putting off some maintenance, and not filling vacancies and laying off where they can, and who knows what else. There's a lot they can't touch, namely contractual salary obligations. But they want to be able to say that they reduced taxes. More concerning will be how much of the costs are bein
Read more

Fewer kids, fewer costumes: What declining school enrollment means for trick-or-treating

Image
Enfield has experienced a significant and ongoing decline in public school enrollment over an 18 year period. When compared to four nearby towns of similar population size, Enfield and Middletown show the steepest declines. Many factors may be contributing to this trend. These include smaller family sizes, lower fertility rates, job market, cost of living including housing costs, an aging population across the state, and an increase in families choosing alternative education options, such as homeschooling. The data is available at EdSight . The enrollment data only covers the last 18 years. Update : After reading some of the insightful Facebook comments , more data is needed to show how population changes are contributing to the school population decline. The comments about an increase in homeschooling were thought-provoking. I wish there was a way to quantify that shift; I suspect the school district may have some estimates. Enfield has experienced an approximate 8.76% decline in popu
Read more

Enfield Town Council's unprofessional action

Image
  Enfield's Town Council is apparently trying to kill a 70-unit housing project in Thompsonville that the Planning and Zoning Commission approved. The Council's behavior has been egregious and unprofessional in pursuit of that goal. It's doing this in secret and risking a lawsuit for murky reasons. Impact Residential Development recently received PZC approval for this project in a 5-2 vote. It was a remarkable and courageous moment for the commission. But the Town Council Republicans want to block it. They are designing in executive session a way to oppose it. They did not let the developer know of their plan until the last minute. Here's the background The developers plan to build this housing on and near the former Strand Theater site, land which the town had acquired. It combines primarily affordable housing and market-rate units with 70 parking spaces. It faced opposition over concerns about on-street parking. The idea is that since this is a transit-oriented develo
Read more