Eight Reasons Enfield Republicans Should Drop the Pride Flag Referendum

Image
  In 2022, the Town Council, under a Democratic majority, approved a policy allowing Pride flags to be displayed at Town Hall during Pride Month in June. After retaking the majority in 2024, Republicans passed an ordinance banning all non-government flags from government buildings. That should have been the end of it. But it wasn't. After forming a Charter Revision Commission, its chair, Mayor Ken Nelson, sought to include what amounts to a permanent Pride Flag ban in the town charter. Changing the town charter requires voter approval through a referendum. If voters approve the measure, future councils must follow the rule unless a new referendum overturns it. Mayor Nelson has been the strongest advocate for putting this on the ballot. "Can the town buildings be used to push a personal ideology on the residents of Enfield?" he asked at the Commission's final meeting. "It is a political issue—it's not our billboard." Last week, the Charter Commission dead...
Post a Comment

Air conditioning for the middle school and climate change


I wrote this for the Facebook Enfield Community Page after some people complained about the need for air conditioning at the JFK middle school

There’s a very interesting climate change calculator in the New York Times based on data by the Climate Impact Lab. It projects the number of 90+ temperature days by year. It’s fun, check it out.

I ran the numbers for Enfield for someone born in 2007. This person would be between the age of 11-12 years and attending middle school.

In 2007, the number of 90 or more degree days was 10. (It’s actually estimated at 9 for this year. There will be variation by year, but the trend is up)

By the time these 11 year olds are 80, in 2087, they could see 25 days that are 90 and above, with a likely range of 90+ degree days of 11 to 38.

These projections assume that mankind will get its act together and try to curb greenhouse gas emissions.

Rising temperatures will create a large number of problems.

It will impact wildlife and plant growing seasons. The changes will happen so quickly nature won’t be able to adjust, and its estimate that as many as 25% of all land animals could become extinct.

Most of the carbon dioxide (CO2) today is absorbed by seawater, and that is raising acidity of the oceans. By the end of this century the acidity levels may be 150% higher. This could disrupt the ocean food chain. The sea levels will rise and if the tundra melts, it will release large amounts of methane, which will accelerate the impacts.

There are a fair number of people who do not believe that mankind is raising the global temperature. But, even if they are raising the temperature, these folks reason, it will help, not hurt, humankind. That’s not what the mainstream science says.

But here’s a test: If you can look a 12 year old in eye and say that climate change is not happening, and even if it is, the impact won’t be bad and there's nothing to worry about, then you pass this test. Because if you can say this to a 12 year old, there is nothing that will convince you otherwise. I’ll accept that.

But a more prudent approach -- even one that has doubts about the science -- will be to say say that there is a risk, and it’s better to take action to reduce the risk, than to do nothing at all.

This is a long way of saying that JFK -- and all our schools -- will have air conditioning. You don’t have a choice. This data only looks at 90 and plus degree days. This doesn’t account for humidity or the number of days where the temperature is above 75 degrees.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fix it or face foreclosure: Enfield’s blight ordinance targets minor issues

Image
  Chipped paint on Town Hall is blight under the town's proposed blight ordinance Imagine being fined $100 a day because your lawn grew too tall while you were in the hospital. Under Enfield's proposed blight ordinance, this nightmare could become a reality for many residents. The Town Council will consider this revised ordinance at its Monday night meeting—but as written, it could harm hundreds of residents over minor cosmetic issues, from overgrown grass to temporary home repairs. While it's reasonable to address properties that pose genuine health and safety risks, this ordinance goes too far by treating cosmetic issues as equally severe. For example, if grass or weeds grow taller than 12 inches, the town can issue a citation requiring correction within 10 days. If it's not addressed in time, the property maintenance inspector can impose fines of $100 a day—with no cap—until the problem is resolved. In extreme cases, these escalating fines could even lead to foreclos...
Read more

Why is Enfield in trouble? Facts with a dose of sarcasm

Image
Molly at School Rally People are going after spending in Enfield and trying to dissect it to see where they can find gross mismanagement. Since the Republicans have been in control for all but two of the last 16 years, let's assume that the town's spending is pristine and error-free and beyond reproach—except for the two years when the Democrats were in charge. As we all know, the Democrats dumped money out of the windows of Town Hall. The Town Council Republicans are going to try to set a token reduction in the Mill Rate. To reach that point, they may have to do some problematic things, such as deferring spending on things like police cruiser replacements and equipment generally, putting off some maintenance, and not filling vacancies and laying off where they can, and who knows what else. There's a lot they can't touch, namely contractual salary obligations. But they want to be able to say that they reduced taxes. More concerning will be how much of the costs are bein...
Read more

Enfield to Pay Over $1 Million in Legal Fees After Violating Disability Rights

Image
AI generated art  Enfield is on the hook for more than $1 million in legal fees after a federal court ruled that the town and its Board of Education violated federal disability laws by failing to accommodate Sarah Hernandez, an autistic and deaf elected official. In 2017, Ms. Hernandez was a newly elected school board member. Instead of providing reasonable accommodations for her to participate in board meetings fully, the town chose to fight a multi-year federal legal battle. After about five years, a U.S. District Court jury ruled in January 2024 that Enfield discriminated against Ms. Hernandez in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). She won little in damages from the court, but the court later issued a permanent injunction requiring the town not to discriminate against people with disabilities. The town had to pay her legal cost, and that bill has arrived. On March 7, the U.S. District Court in Bridgeport ordered Enfield to pay $964,366 in attorneys' fees and ...
Read more