Charter Commission proposes 7% budget cap, a fix that won't solve the problem

Image
Charter Revision Commission. Budget limit debate on YouTube video starts at about 1:24:00 The Charter Revision Commission (CRC) approved a budget referendum, but only if officials proposed a budget that exceeded a 7% increase. If the budget fails in the referendum, it would automatically cap at 7%. By forcing a referendum on any budget exceeding 7%, the CRC proposal effectively imposes a budget cap. While this might sound like a way to control taxes, it overlooks a fundamental issue: property tax rates fluctuate due to factors outside the town’s control. The 2023 budget year proves this point: even with a 5.4% budget increase, homeowners saw their tax bills jump by 8-9%. The increase in taxes wasn't entirely due to spending—it happened because property taxes are affected by multiple conditions. A budget cap wouldn't have prevented these increases. Enfield's problem is revenue. Property taxes must make up the difference when other revenue sources decline—whether state aid, ...

Connecticut Millennials are overpaying for higher education


The new Democratic nominee for governor, New Lamont, says he wants to make make community college free for those students with "financial need." That's great, except just about everyone graduating from college today is in "financial need."
My benchmark on this issue is from my own experience.
I started attending Central Connecticut State University in 1976. A full year – two semesters – cost an in-state resident in tuition and fees $601. 
Adjusted for inflation, the $601 tuition/fees that I paid in 1976 should be, in today's 2018 dollars, $2,693.
For the 2017-18 academic year, the in-state tuition and fees at CCSU is $10,225 – adjusted for inflation, that is almost four times my cost
Moreover, I did not pay tuition because my non-combat military service was Vietnam era. (The state still has a veteran waiver, but I'm not sure if it's as comprehensive.)
When I was a Connecticut student, I can't recall anyone complaining about the cost of college. The idea that students would graduate with a mountain a debt wasn't a topic of discussion. It wasn't the crisis it is today.
In my view, in-state students are getting the short-end. We have screwed our state students over royally, and the Millennial generation is paying far more for college than I was asked to pay. There is no reason for it.
While the idea that college should be "free" is often met derision, the reality is that college was practically free for my Baby Boom generation.
The counter-arguments to this take two tracks. First, reducing state college tuition and the debt burden for new Connecticut students will be unfair those students still paying down debt. Second, as expensive as the Connecticut state universities are today they are one third to one fourth the cost of a private college. 
We have to start somewhere in this state. Connecticut's state colleges as well as the community colleges should be affordable. As affordable as they were for the Baby Boom generation. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fix it or face foreclosure: Enfield’s blight ordinance targets minor issues

Why is Enfield in trouble? Facts with a dose of sarcasm

Fewer kids, fewer costumes: What declining school enrollment means for trick-or-treating