Enfield considers charter changes that could reshape its political landscape

Image
Charter Revision Commission meeting last week Enfield’s Charter Revision Commission met Thursday for its first in-depth workshop, generating a long list of proposals that could significantly alter how the town governs itself. Ideas ranged from switching to a two-year budget cycle, allowing a budget referendum, and compensating elected officials, or even shifting to a mayoral form of government. Other proposals included banning profanity on signs, locking non-governmental flag restrictions into the Charter, and changes such ending council districts. The meeting was structured as a pitch session, with each commission member suggesting topics for future discussion. In-depth discussions are to take place at subsequent meetings. While many proposals are unlikely to move forward—either because of insufficient support or legal concerns raised by the Town Attorney—the meeting highlighted potential flashpoints for what promises to be a spirited Charter revision process. Mayor Nelson’s Proposals...

Connecticut Millennials are overpaying for higher education


The new Democratic nominee for governor, New Lamont, says he wants to make make community college free for those students with "financial need." That's great, except just about everyone graduating from college today is in "financial need."
My benchmark on this issue is from my own experience.
I started attending Central Connecticut State University in 1976. A full year – two semesters – cost an in-state resident in tuition and fees $601. 
Adjusted for inflation, the $601 tuition/fees that I paid in 1976 should be, in today's 2018 dollars, $2,693.
For the 2017-18 academic year, the in-state tuition and fees at CCSU is $10,225 – adjusted for inflation, that is almost four times my cost
Moreover, I did not pay tuition because my non-combat military service was Vietnam era. (The state still has a veteran waiver, but I'm not sure if it's as comprehensive.)
When I was a Connecticut student, I can't recall anyone complaining about the cost of college. The idea that students would graduate with a mountain a debt wasn't a topic of discussion. It wasn't the crisis it is today.
In my view, in-state students are getting the short-end. We have screwed our state students over royally, and the Millennial generation is paying far more for college than I was asked to pay. There is no reason for it.
While the idea that college should be "free" is often met derision, the reality is that college was practically free for my Baby Boom generation.
The counter-arguments to this take two tracks. First, reducing state college tuition and the debt burden for new Connecticut students will be unfair those students still paying down debt. Second, as expensive as the Connecticut state universities are today they are one third to one fourth the cost of a private college. 
We have to start somewhere in this state. Connecticut's state colleges as well as the community colleges should be affordable. As affordable as they were for the Baby Boom generation. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fix it or face foreclosure: Enfield’s blight ordinance targets minor issues

Why is Enfield in trouble? Facts with a dose of sarcasm

Fewer kids, fewer costumes: What declining school enrollment means for trick-or-treating